• Navigation icon for News

    News

    • US Food
    • UK Food
    • Drinks
    • Celebrity
    • Restaurants and bars
    • TV and Film
    • Social Media
  • Navigation icon for Cooking

    Cooking

    • Recipes
    • Air fryer
  • Navigation icon for Health

    Health

    • Diet
    • Vegan
  • Navigation icon for Fast Food

    Fast Food

    • McDonalds
    • Starbucks
    • Burger King
    • Subway
    • Dominos
  • Facebook
    Instagram
    YouTube
    TikTok
    X
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
TikTok
X
Submit Your Content
SNAP benefit recipients facing tighter restrictions for 2026
Home>News>US Food
Published 16:42 19 Dec 2025 GMT

SNAP benefit recipients facing tighter restrictions for 2026

The Trump Administration is allowing 12 states to change a certain definition

Britt Jones

Britt Jones

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Doug MILLS / POOL / AFP via Getty Images

Topics: US Food, Health

Britt Jones
Britt Jones

Advert

Advert

Advert

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has revealed the restrictions it is going to place upon those who are under the food assistance programme.

For millions of households across the US, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) was put in place to act as a practical support net for families who need help with their grocery bills amid rising living costs.

It is overseen by federal funding and state administration and has been helping people in the nation since the 60s.

It provides food stamp vouchers and other aid to low-income families, but SNAP has become the focus of public scrutiny after the USDA approved six new state waivers that would allow tighter restrictions on what foods can be purchased with the benefits next year.

Advert

SNAP is changing (Getty Stock Images)
SNAP is changing (Getty Stock Images)

According to a press release issued on 10 December, US Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins made the announcement with US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F Kennedy Jr.

Apparently, this is all part of the ‘Make America Healthy Again’ (MAHA) initiative.

The waivers were submitted by Hawai‘i, Missouri, North Dakota, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia which would go on the change the definition of ‘food for purchase’ for SNAP benefits receivers within those states.

“President [Donald] Trump has made it clear: we are restoring SNAP to its true purpose – nutrition,” Rollins said in the release.

She said that it aims to stop people spending money on ultra processed foods and products linked to obesity and diet-related illnesses.

But ultimately, it’s up to the states which they have decided to keep available for purchase.

However, it could mean that the 12 states could ban treats and snacks.

It changes what can be bought with the stamps (Getty Stock Images)
It changes what can be bought with the stamps (Getty Stock Images)

“We cannot continue a system that forces taxpayers to fund programs that make people sick and then pay a second time to treat the illnesses those very programs help create,” RFK Jr. said.

This comes after the Trump administration was called out for allegedly attempting to cut benefits in Democratic-led states.

The Trump administration has warned it will withhold SNAP benefits from Democratic-led states that refuse to provide recipient data to the federal government this week, in a bold move.

Agriculture secretary Brooke Rollins said the US Department of Agriculture could begin blocking funds next week, leaving those in need to struggle.

Rollins said the information they want is needed to, reported by The Guardian, 'root out this fraud, to make sure that those who really need food stamps are getting them, but also to ensure that the American taxpayer is protected'.

She added: “Twenty-nine states said yes – not surprisingly, the red states… But 21 states including California, New York and Minnesota, blue states, continue to say no.”

Rollins went on to warn that ‘as of next week, we have begun and will begin to stop moving federal funds into those states until they comply.’

Choose your content:

3 hours ago
2 days ago
  • yasharu/Getty Images
    3 hours ago

    World Cup alcohol tags fitted to Brits in 'cruel' drinking ban

    It follows an increase in alcohol-related violence

    News
  • Jade GAO / AFP via Getty Images
    3 hours ago

    Why more than 2,000 Starbucks stores are closed today

    Coffee drinkers are having to go without following an earlier controversy

    News
  • LEON NEAL/AFP via Getty Images
    2 days ago

    Cadbury manufacturer defends staying in Russia in attempt to 'not take a side'

    The boss also claimed the UK's junk food ban may force the company to rethink its commitment

    News
  • YouTube/The Louis Theroux Podcast
    2 days ago

    Marco Pierre White's 'triviliasing' remark on Gordon Ramsay feud is like 'HR meeting gone wrong'

    The Godfather of Modern Cooking made the blunt confession whilst on Louix Theroux's podcast

    News
  • Controversial changes to SNAP benefits in 2026 explained
  • 'Dirty Dozen' list unveiled for 2026 - here are all the foods you should avoid
  • What you should always look out for when buying eggs for 'best welfare'
  • Mac and Cheese urgently recalled across US over risk of 'adverse health consequences'